June 18, 2025

|

politics
democrats
us politics

Zohran Mamdani's Victory is a Signal the Democratic Party Can't Ignore

What does Zohran Mamdani's overwhelming victory in the NYC Mayoral race mean for the liberal establishment?

Zohran Mamdani's Victory is a Signal the Democratic Party Can't Ignore
Michael Albert
Michael Albert
@mta630

Zohran Mamdani's Victory Is a Signal the Democratic Party Can't Ignore

On June 24, 2025, something happened in New York that the political establishment would love to treat as a local anomaly—but it wasn't. Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist and member of the DSA, decisively won his primary race, reaffirming not just his base, but the strength of a movement that mainstream Democrats have been trying to suppress, ignore, or co-opt since 2016.

This wasn't a fluke. It was a clear rejection of the centrist playbook.


A Win Rooted in Real Organizing

Mamdani didn't win because he had corporate backing or establishment endorsements—he won because he built power the hard way: through consistent grassroots organizing, tenant rights advocacy, and showing up for his constituents in ways most politicians simply don't.

Unlike the performative centrists in the party who show up on MSNBC panels and then disappear when real action is needed, Mamdani and candidates like him build long-term trust with the working class. His campaign wasn't just a protest vote—it was a product of movement infrastructure: tenant unions, mutual aid networks, climate justice coalitions, and unapologetic left-wing platforms.


The Establishment's Strategy Failed

For the past few years, establishment Democrats have leaned on fear: fear of Republican fascism, fear of losing suburban moderates, fear of the "too far left" boogeyman. But fear isn't a strategy—and it sure as hell isn't a vision.

Mamdani's victory shows that bold, class-based politics aren't electoral suicide—they're necessary. Voters, especially young ones, are tired of triangulation, platitudes, and being told what's "realistic" by people who've failed to deliver basic needs for decades.

The party apparatus threw its weight against the left. It lost.


What This Means for the Democratic Party

If the Democratic Party continues to push leftists to the margins, it will fracture. Full stop. There is a generational and ideological shift happening within the base: working people, renters, immigrants, and Gen Z are done waiting for incrementalism.

The Mamdani victory is a flashing red light that the future of the party is not with corporate PAC money, performative wokeness, or Cold War liberalism—it's with democratic socialism, housing justice, and redistributive economic policies.


The Left Is Here to Stay

Let's be clear: Mamdani is part of a larger wave. From India Walton to Summer Lee to Kristen Gonzalez, there's an emerging coalition of candidates who aren't just running as progressives—they're running as movement candidates. Their politics aren't filtered through the lens of what's palatable to Chuck Schumer or Hakeem Jeffries. They're grounded in material reality.

The Democratic Party has two options: adapt or lose. Embrace the left and build a party that actually meets the needs of people—or keep catering to corporate donors and risk losing the next generation entirely.

Mamdani's win wasn't just a local story—it was a proof of concept.

And we're just getting started.